Revenue Source

Welcome to the Revenue Source affiliate marketing forums.

You are viewing our internet marketing and SEO forums as a guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions.  By joining our free community, you will have access to post affiliate marketing topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), exchange SEO strategies, and access many other special features.  Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Go Back   Revenue Source > Affiliate Marketing Hangout > Search Engine Optimization / Marketing
Reload this Page Why Pay-Per-Inclusion Search Engines Are Dying
Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
ValiantMarketer is Offline
Revenue Source Member
ValiantMarketer is worth a listen.ValiantMarketer is worth a listen.ValiantMarketer is worth a listen.
 
ValiantMarketer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 162
Jason C
Affiliate Mgmt/Consultant
Affiliate Consultant/Affiliate
California United States
   
Why Pay-Per-Inclusion Search Engines Are Dying - 11-09-2004

A Pay-Per-Inclusion search engine is a service in which a search engine charges you a certain amount to spider and include your website in its database. For this fee, regular repeated spiderings are guaranteed, so you are sure to be indexed.

However, rankings are not guaranteed. These pages have no advantage over any page submitted for free. A few years ago, pay-per-inclusion search engines such as Inktomi, Altavista, Ask Jeeves and Yahoo were introduced. However, they have failed badly and have lost traffic to Google.

Why Google is Tops

Google built the LARGEST search engine database because it refused to adopt the pay-per-inclusion model. By allowing every website to submit its pages free, it built an enormous database of websites. Good news for everyone searching Google's database!

Google's competitors were unable to deliver the same results, partly because they had fewer websites to choose from. If you charge for entry into a search engine, you eliminate over 90% of the websites on the Net which cannot justify such a fee.

What the pay-per-inclusion search engines did not understand was that their real customers were the ADVERTISERS and not the searchers. Nor were the websites the customers of the engines.

The advertisers pay the search engines, so they are the customers. Google recognised this and decided to keep the advertisers happy by providing a large database of websites. This large database became well known and it attracted great numbers of searches. These searches were exposed to the advertisers' products and the searches led to good sales. To make this most efficient, search engine submission must be free.

Search Engine Model is Similar to Television

This is all similar to television where programmes are made for the masses and given away free. Then the advertisers step in and make the money! As a search engine survives by the quality of its search results, surfers and sites flocked to Google making it the number one search engine.

Why the Death of Pay-Per-Inclusion SE's is Good for Small Sites

Only large quality SE databases can fulfil the needs of surfers. Your relationships with the search engines is one of mutual benefit. You need the traffic and the search engines provide the quality content.

Therefore by creating good websites with quality content and submitting them free to the search engines, you are both winning. There is no need to spend enormous amounts on search engine submission and optimisation. All you need to do is create good websites with the appropriate keywords for your pages and everything else will take care of itself.

Of course, this is where we were at the beginning of the Internet revolution, except certain search engines got too greedy and thought they could cash in on unfortunate small website owners!

View All Articles by John Lynch
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
RS Marifer is Offline
Revenue Source Admin
RS Marifer is full of knowledge.RS Marifer is full of knowledge.RS Marifer is full of knowledge.RS Marifer is full of knowledge.
 
RS Marifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 289
Marifer V.
Affiliate Mgmt/Consultant
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Colombia
   
Never like the PPI model, anyway! - 11-12-2004

Couple of weeks ago, I was looking for Mahi-Mahi recipes and the best recipe that I found was at a personal site. Personal and small sites have true original content but do not have the marketing money to pay for inclusion or they do not plan to be a money making website.

Another reason why I do not like Pay per Inclusion is that it goes against the linking method. For example: same recipe story. Let's say is the best mahi-mahi recipe in the world and more than 1,000 sites are linking to it. Is Inktomi not going to show it to users because is not included?

Pay per inclusion model takes away from the most important thing on Search: Relevance.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Revenue Sharing Ads
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads for: Why Pay-Per-Inclusion Search Engines Are Dying
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tutorial: How Web Design can affect your SEO efforts RS Marifer Search Engine Optimization / Marketing 1 02-16-2005 06:27 PM
Search Engine Spider, Index, And Ranking ValiantMarketer Search Engine Optimization / Marketing 0 11-30-2004 04:11 AM
Targeting Usage Demographics to Increase Paid Search Conversions. ValiantMarketer Search Engine Optimization / Marketing 0 11-11-2004 06:42 AM
Alternative search engines have far to go to catch giants, Hitwise reports ValiantMarketer Search Engine Optimization / Marketing 0 11-09-2004 07:17 PM
Are Links Hurting Search Relevance? RS Tom Internet Marketing Articles 0 11-09-2004 06:46 PM



© 2004-6 RevenueSource.com.  All rights reserved.  Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.
This website and its logos/design are property of RevenueSource.com.  All rights reserved. vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34