Revenue Source

Welcome to the Revenue Source affiliate marketing forums.

You are viewing our internet marketing and SEO forums as a guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions.  By joining our free community, you will have access to post affiliate marketing topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), exchange SEO strategies, and access many other special features.  Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Go Back   Revenue Source > Affiliate Marketing Hangout > Internet Marketing Articles > SEO / SEM
Reload this Page Myth busting: virtual hosts vs. dedicated IP addresses
Tags: , , , , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
SEO Blogs is Offline
Revenue Source Veteran
SEO Blogs is worth a listen.SEO Blogs is worth a listen.SEO Blogs is worth a listen.
 
SEO Blogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 824
   
Myth busting: virtual hosts vs. dedicated IP addresses - 11-15-2006

I hear that there was recently a discussion on a NANOG (North American Network Operators Group) email list about virtual hosting vs. dedicated IP addresses. They were commenting on the misconception that having multiple sites hosted on the same IP address will in some way affect the PageRanks of those sites. There is no PageRank difference whatsoever between these two cases (virtual hosting vs. a dedicated IP). Someone on the email discussion already dug out this Slashdot interview from mid-2003 with Craig Silverstein, Google’s Director of Technology. I refer to question 5, in which someone asked
Why in this day and age does google continue to penalize sites that are virtual hosted? With ip addresses becoming harder to get/justify every day why does google discount the relevance of links that don’t come from a unique ip address. Please don’t just deny it, I think the Internet community deserves an explanation.
Craig’s reply was as follows:
I can’t just deny it? What are my other choices? Actually, Google handles virtually hosted domains and their links just the same as domains on unique IP addresses. If your ISP does virtual hosting correctly, you’ll never see a difference between the two cases. We do see a small percentage of ISPs every month that misconfigure their virtual hosting, which might account for this persistent misperception–thanks for giving me the chance to dispel a myth!
I’m happy to affirm that this statement which was true in 2003 is still true now. Links to virtually hosted domains are treated the same as links to domains on dedicated IP addresses.


Myth busting: virtual hosts vs. dedicated IP addresses - Read More...
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads for: Myth busting: virtual hosts vs. dedicated IP addresses
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Myth busting: delays in page loading SEO Blogs SEO / SEM 0 11-15-2006 09:50 PM
Myth busting: Links in Gmail SEO Blogs SEO / SEM 0 11-15-2006 09:50 PM
Merchant 5970 - Digiturf.com Virtual Horse Racing - FREE Virtual Horse worth $15! Aff Affiliate Marketing News Shareasale Affiliate Deals 0 10-17-2006 07:27 PM
Virtual Office Affiliate Program: Justin_Harrison Affiliate Program Announcements 0 02-28-2006 11:31 AM
An introduction from one of your hosts RS Mike Goofing Around & Program Discussion 4 11-24-2004 07:45 PM



© 2004-6 RevenueSource.com.  All rights reserved.  Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.
This website and its logos/design are property of RevenueSource.com.  All rights reserved. vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34